Sunday, November 24, 2024

Interesting Interview: Jen Kneeland

This week's Interesting Interview is with the one and only Jen Kneeland!  Jen is active in The Priory Scholars of NYC and The Adventuresses of Sherlock Holmes, has participated in The Baker Street Almanac, and founded 221B NYC, a group that is actively bringing new folks to Sherlockiana.  While she is well known to New York Sherlockians, many people across the country have missed out on getting to know a genuinely delightful person.  So for all of us outside of New York, let's get to know a Sherlockian who always has a smile on her face, Jen Kneeland!


How do you define the word “Sherlockian”?

I tend to define “Sherlockians” as a self-selecting group.  Anyone who is a fan of Sherlock Holmes has the potential to be a Sherlockian.  To me, the main differences between a casual fan and a Sherlockian is people wanting to apply that label to themselves, and the drive for MORE.  Whether that be more stories by way of pastiche/adaptations, more discussion around the stories, more time re-reading stories, or even just more community with other fans.  A Sherlockian is a fan who seeks out something beyond just a single read of the original texts.  


How did you become a Sherlockian?

I became a Sherlockian slowly.  I’d read a few of the short stories ("The Red-Headed League" and "Adventure of the Speckled Band") in a middle school anthology and enjoyed them, but at the time it didn’t lead to my seeking more.  In a way, technology led me back to Holmes—when I first got an e-reader and was looking at stories in the public domain to download, remembering the stories I had read years ago,  The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes was one of the first books that I downloaded.  It was still a fairly solitary pursuit for me for a few years, but as I met other fans I realized how much I had been wanting people to discuss the stories with and really dive deeper in.  As more adaptations like BBC Sherlock and the RDJ movie came out I realized that I had developed quite strong feelings about what elements of each worked or didn’t work for me. 

What is your profession and does that affect how you enjoy being a Sherlockian?

I’m now in my 20th year as an educator, and it absolutely affects my approach to being a Sherlockian. Sometimes it’s in somewhat silly ways—it’s not uncommon for me to use large chart paper when I’m doing a presentation or leading a discussion, and I’ve organized what I refer to as “field trips” to different exhibits or events.  On a deeper level, I’m sure it’s a large part of my fascination with what led to the Sherlock Holmes that we all know.  My work has mostly been with kindergarten through second grade students (and their teachers), but I’ve worked with students as young as three years old.  As a literacy coach, a fair amount of my current work is focused around how people learn to read in the literal sense of decoding words and understanding meaning. But also the way the mind works and how we process and retain information.  In some ways I do see Holmes as childlike in how he operates with the world—often driven by impulses, doing things for reasons that are clear to him (though not always others), and able to make connections that most of us don’t always pay attention to. 

I guess this is a good example of how working in an elementary school influences how I engage as a Sherlockian.  One of our other “field trip” Meetups was to the Whitney Museum.  We had about a dozen people attend, so I sent them around in teams for an hour with a few cards each, then we gathered together and each team showed us the artwork they decided was a match for their cards.


What is your favorite canonical story?

While sometimes my favorite may vary, I am unashamed of how cliché of an answer a story that is always amongst my top 5 or so is—"A Scandal in Bohemia." While it was not the first short story that I read, I think it’s absolutely brilliant as a way to introduce Holmes to the world.  He’s clearly so intelligent, but here he is out-smarted.  While part of why I love it is indeed for Irene Adler, an even larger art is because of the dramatic tension that it creates.  Most of the stories wouldn’t be as interesting if we didn’t have the idea in the back of our heads that this could be it—this might be the time that he really fails.     

Who is a specific Sherlockian that you think others would find interesting?

There are pretty much no wrong answers here, but I’m going to say Jacquelynn Bost Morris. I first met her at one of the Scintillation of Scions events that she organized and have been lucky enough to get to know her better online.  I am in awe of how kind and empathetic she is, as well as how ready she is to step in and help anyone feel welcome.

What subset of Sherlockiana really interests you?

I am utterly charmed by the quirky subsets that one might not think necessary, but that absolutely add to the feeling of connectedness.  Queer Sherlockian groups are almost too obvious, since we of course bring our own identities to how we read the stories and characters.  So it’s some of the smaller groups, where people have decided “You know what?  Actually we need a group for Sherlockians who also_____” and just the ones I know of range from things like “love tea” and “smoke cigars” to “own tiaras” (or harpoons!) to “have dirty minds.”    


What is 221B NYC and how does it differ from more traditional Sherlockian societies?

221B NYC is a group originally organized on Meetup.com that formed in 2015.  While there are many wonderful scions and societies that meet in or near NYC there weren’t any that I was aware of that were very active with outings and tangential Sherlock Holmes experiences.  We’ve done things like visited a corn maze, met to solve some of the “Hunt a Killer” mystery boxes, escape rooms, tea tastings, board game nights, scavenger hunts, trips to movies and plays, and museum visits.  Once I realized how many people were becoming regulars with the group who hadn’t read any of the canon we started adding in more story discussions as well.  There is something absolutely delightful about helping people discover the stories for the first time—it actually wasn’t uncommon for one or two people to come to our discussions who still hadn’t read the short story, or only read as much as they had had time for on the train ride there.  It was so interesting to get such a fresh take on the stories or ask them what they thought might happen based on how far they had read and/or someone’s comment. 

I also like the whimsical nature of some of the events that we’ve had.  Sometimes members have said things like “I found the worst movie—we have to watch it!” Another activity that I particularly loved was the year that we met at a bar on May 4th and played with a giant Jenga set.  I’d taped a cutout of Holmes and Moriarty to one of the blocks that we set up on top.  After each turn moving a block there was a trivia question related to "The Final Problem." If the person answered correctly, it was just the one regular turn.  An incorrect response meant needing to place two Jenga blocks in a turn, thus being more likely to make Holmes fall.  Was it silly?  Absolutely! But it was also a lot of fun!

Many of our original regular attendees are no longer in NYC—some had started to move pre-pandemic, but many others left after 2020.  We haven’t been as active as we once were when it was common to have 2-3 events per month, but the group holds a special place in my heart and I’m always happy when we still have an event!


As a fan of the theater, you must have some strong opinions about adapting the Canon for the stage and screen.  What are some standout performances to you?

A problem I have often found with Canon being adapted for stage is the question of who the intended audience is.  Shows that are really focused on being accessible to people who haven’t read any of the stories often have to do too much world-building to effectively tell a story that is compelling to those of us already very familiar with Holmes.  Sometimes the solution has been to engage in very silly story telling, which hasn’t always worked for me.  Some ways that it has been more effective, in my opinion, include when it is blended with another element.  A Sherlock Carol played at New World Stages for a couple of years, and wove together Holmes and Watson with characters from A Christmas Carol. It was a festive, seasonal delight.

This may seem counterintuitive but one of the best experiences I’ve ever had with Holmes on stage wasn’t actually a play.  In 2015 Michael Chabon performed a dramatic reading of "The Final Problem" at Symphony Space.  It was such a lovely way to really focus on the original text, but with the added experience of the audience reactions to hearing the story.  (Additionally, I found it hilarious when he stayed late because his mother had sent him photos of some Holmes fanfiction she had found around her house that he’d written as a boy, and he wanted to read that aloud to us as well!  It was a very memorable night!)


What book would you recommend to other Sherlockians?

I’d recommend A Study in Scarlet Women by Sherry Thomas.  Particularly with a lot of modern adaptations it’s easy to forget just how much certain factors—like Holmes’ gender really played a huge role in how he was able to behave.

Where do you see Sherlockiana in 5 or 10 years from now?

I think we’re going to continue to see this interesting blend of the in-person events that are largely back as well as some of these wonderful online meetings that have helped connect worldwide Sherlockians.  The work that has been done to start digitizing back catalogues of Sherlockian publications seems like a really promising way to ensure that the scholarship sticks around!    

Sunday, November 17, 2024

Interesting Interview: Stephen Chahn Lee

I first met Stephen Lee when he was handing out free books at the vendor's room during the Birthday Weekend.  Who doesn't want to meet someone who is giving away free books?  That book was Sherlock Holmes and the Silent Contest which I promptly dropped into my bag and moved around to other tables.  But when I finally read this slim volume, Holy Cow!  Stephen has done some amazing work to reconcile major issues in the Sherlockian Canon.

Soon after that, Stephen started popping up in all kinds of places: his Modern Detection substack, a Crew of the Barque Lone Star meeting, the Federal Bar Association, Harper's Magazine, and the 2024 class of the Baker Street Irregulars.  So what's this guy got to say?  Read along to find out!


How do you define the word “Sherlockian”?

To me, anyone who loves Sherlock Holmes stories and treats them as something worth analyzing is a Sherlockian.  We don’t all read the stories the same way, but I think we all think that there’s something worth studying and discussing.

How did you become a Sherlockian?

I came to Sherlock Holmes later than many other Sherlockians.  I did not read the stories as a child but read them all for the first time as an adult and while I was working as a federal prosecutor.  When I read the stories, I saw things from the perspective of someone who had actually investigated real-life crimes, and I thought the stories were actually very good from that perspective.  Sherlock Holmes is not a magician or a superhero, but someone who brings a lot of academic and practical experience to his craft, so much so that what he does seems magical or amazing to others.

Even so, I was not expecting to dig deep into Sherlock Holmes until I realized that Sir Arthur Conan Doyle never really told us in "The Final Problem" how Sherlock Holmes brought down Professor Moriarty.  Holmes sees Watson for the first time in months and tells him that he has been investigating London’s criminal mastermind. 

“If a detailed account of that silent contest could be written, it would take its place as the most brilliant bit of thrust-and-parry work in the history of detection,” Holmes says.  “Never have I risen to such a height, and never have I been so hard pressed by an opponent.”

But Holmes and Watson never tell us what Holmes did.  Instead, the rest of "The Final Problem" is a chase through Europe ending at the Reichenbach Falls.

I was disappointed in "The Final Problem," but then I read The Valley of Fear, which turned everything upside down.  In that story, we learn that Holmes had been investigating Moriarty for many years and we learn some of the steps that Holmes has taken.  But we also realize that some aspects of The Valley of Fear contradict "The Final Problem."  Many Sherlockians had noticed this before, but I realized that some of my real-life experience investigating crimes could provide an explanation that fit within the canon.  I ended up studying the entire canon in this light and then wrote up my monograph “Sherlock Holmes and the Silent Contest,” which I self-published and distributed at the BSI weekend in January 2022.


What is your profession and does that affect how you enjoy being a Sherlockian?

I was a federal prosecutor for 11 years and have been in private practice since 2019, and I focus on health care fraud cases.  I started off my professional career as a newspaper reporter.  All of this has given me a lot of experience conducting investigations, and I think that informs my love and appreciation for the Sherlock Holmes stories.

The stories hold up very well in terms of investigations and offer a lot of practical advice for people who do investigations.  I love the line, “If you have all the details of a thousand [crimes] at your finger ends, it is odd if you can’t unravel the thousand and first.”  This resonates with my experience investigating crimes.  The first time I investigated a bank robbery or a health care fraud scheme, those cases seemed difficult.  But as I did more of these cases, I knew what to look for and found things that others had missed.

What is your favorite canonical story?

I recommend "The Adventure of the Red-Headed League" because it’s such a great introduction to Sherlock Holmes and his world.  The idea is clever, and the execution is fun.

In terms of the Silent Contest idea, I love A Study in Scarlet.  I imagine what Watson and Holmes must have considered in deciding what should go into print.  What secrets did they leave out, and what misdirection are they doing?  One of the most famous parts of that story is when Watson reveals that his friend does not know whether the earth goes around the sun or vice versa.  Everyone laughs at this, and Professor Moriarty would have laughed more than anyone else.  But I think that Watson and Holmes actually had the last laugh, knowing that this seemingly extraneous bit would lull Moriarty into complacency.

Who is a specific Sherlockian that you think others would find interesting?

I’ve met a lot of amazing Sherlockians over the years, but I want to highlight Nicholas Meyer, whose Seven Per-cent Solution was a great attempt at reconciling the oddities of the Moriarty story.  Nicholas and I came up with very different solutions, but I think that his work is a great supplement to the canon. 


As someone who read the Canon for the first time in the past few years, how much had pop culture influenced what you did or did not expect from the stories? 

I think my longtime love of comic books helped me view the canon with a fresh perspective.  Readers of comic books are very used to stories that contradict each other and that effectively rewrite old stories (“retconning”), and Stan Lee of Marvel Comics offered “No-Prizes” to people who could explain away mistakes in the comics.  All this probably helped make me very comfortable with seeing contradictions in the canon and then trying to come up with ways to reconcile them

What book would you recommend to other Sherlockians?

In terms of non-canonical fictional works, one of my favorites is Neil Gaiman’s A Study in Emerald, which brings Lovecraftian horror to Victorian London in a clever way.  It’s better to read it not knowing much about the story, but it provides a great perspective on the canon.

For non-fiction, I highly recommend Daniel Kahneman’s Thinking, Fast and Slow.  This book is a great resource for understanding how people actually think and the flaws in our reasoning.  This is something that I think we all could better understand.

In terms of non-Sherlock mysteries, I highly recommend The Devotion of Suspect X by Keigo Higashino.  This is not a whodunnit mystery, but a duel of wits and logic between two brilliant adversaries.  It’s not quite Sherlock Holmes vs. Moriarty, but it’s close!


Where do you see Sherlockiana in 5 or 10 years from now?

I hope we get more fresh perspectives from people who love the stories but might not even know about the Sherlockian community.  I actually sat on the Silent Contest for a few years after finishing my monograph because I was not sure what to do with it and did not know about scion societies at the time.  I am sure there are more people out there whom we can reach and who would have a lot to give, and I hope to bring more people into our community.